Guilt in voting and public good games

Unraveling Public Good Games

This paper provides experimental evidence on how players predict end-game effects in a linear public good game. Our regression analysis yields a measure of the relative importance of priors and signals on subjects’ beliefs on contributions and allows us to conclude that, first, the weight of the signal is relatively unimportant, while priors have a large weight and, second, priors are the same ...

Aggregative Public Good Games

We exploit the aggregative structure of the public good model to provide a simple analysis of the voluntary contribution game. In contrast to the best response function approach, ours avoids the proliferation of dimensions as the number of players is increased, and can readily analyse games involving many heterogeneous players. We demonstrate the approach at work on the standard pure public eco...

Ex Interim Voting in Public Good Provision

Quadratic Voting and the Public Good: Introduction

This introduction to the Public Choice special issue on “Quadratic Voting and the Public Good” provides an opinionated narrative summary of the contents and surveys the broader literature related to Quadratic Voting (QV). QV is a voting rule, proposed by one of us (Weyl, 2012; Lalley and Weyl, 2016) building off earlier work by Groves and Ledyard (1977) and Hylland and Zeckhauser (1980), where ...

Growth and Inequality in Public Good Games

In a novel experimental design we study public good games with dynamic interdependencies. More precisely, each agent’s income at the end of a period serves as her endowment in the following period. In this setting growth and inequality arise endogenously allowing us to address new questions regarding their interplay and effect on cooperation levels. In stark contrast to standard public good exp...